Town of Red Hook Town Board
Public Hearing
May 10, 2005
Senior Citizen Exemption
Supervisor Blum Bump called the Public Hearing to order on May 10, 2005 at 7:15
p.m. by reading a copy of the legal notice and a copy of Local Law No. 2 of 2005
amending Local Law No. 1 of 1992 which is Section 126-2 of Chapter 126 Taxation
Senior Citizens Exemption of the Code of the Town of Red Hook.
Councilwoman Crane explained that seniors in 1992 up to present day in order to
qualify for the 50% they had to be making less than $15,000. With this new law
they can make up to $24,000 to qualify for 50%. Hopefully this will help some of
the seniors. To qualify for this you must apply by March 1st of 2006.
Councilman Ross said this puts the Town on the same scale as the County for
exemption the school has an exemption that is slightly higher.
Motion by Supervisor Blum Bump, seconded by Councilman Ross that the Public
Hearing is closed at 7:30 p.m. on the Senior Citizen Tax Exemption.
Conservation Easement Law
Supervisor Blum Bump opened the second Public Hearing on the Local Law
Conservation Easement at 7:30 p.m. by reading the legal notice and a copy of the
Local Law.
Robert McKeon Chairman of Agricultural and Open Space Committee explained this
local law would give owners of large parcels a tax break if they don't develop
their open lands for at least 5 years.
Research was done in other towns, Clifton Park and the Town of Perinton had this
program since 1976 where they had a little over 200 signed up for the program
and now 29 years later they have a little under 200, we would have 122 eligible.
The Town Board would allow those who own at least 10 acres of undeveloped land
to place a conservation easement on that property for a specific length of time.
Marcy Appell...would placing a conservation easement on our property would it
lower reducing town, school and county property taxes for the life of the
easement is the way I interpret this law.
Attorney Trezza replied that is correct.
Becky Thorton of the Dutchess Land Conservancy not for profit organization ...
Red Hook has been the model for all the other Towns in Dutchess starting with
the passage of your bond to protect Agricultural land. It was a step in keeping
open space her in Red Hook. Happy to see Red Hook still in the forefront making
proposals to put more tools in place to preserve the rural character. We need to
provide an incentive to keep the land open so we need to assist land owners who
want to keep open space and allow future growth of the Town.
Scenic Hudson representative who works through the Hudson Valley and focus on
River front properties like the Town of Red Hook to promote environmental
issues, land conservation, smart growth development and other things along that
line. Red Hook is a precedent setter of its own through the valley. It's just
the general rural character that draws people to a place like this. It takes a
lot of tools to make these things happen. The term easement would be just
another tool for someone to help hold their land open and preserve the rural
character.
At this time Supervisor Blum Bump opened the floor for comments.
Betty Mae Van Parys said she came from the Rochester area and knows Town of
Perinton is a very rich community so they didn't mind doing it. I think you
should do a twenty to thirty year easements not five years we would benefit
more. How much land is available for these easements?
Robert McKeon said that 4,000 acres are eligible.
Lou Dondero... after studying Robert McKeon's figures he has more inaccuracies
that accuracies.
Terry Schaff said I am very interested as I feel it would cost more if we
allowed development.
Lee Ann Hanson... if you have all this acreage people aren't going to develop it
anyway I don't feel I should pay other peoples share of taxes.
Resident Richard Franklin said he spoke to the Assessor in Perinton who gave him
comparison figures. Perinton has the base to put a program like this in place,
we do not. No one is doing their homework checking out all these facts and
figures.
Paul Fredricks resident who thinks the Zoning and our zoning code are doing a
good job protecting open space and would like to see more effort done in that
direction than have the poor people take up the taxes. You were just offering
the seniors a tax break and now you are asking them to pay more taxes.
Thomas LeGrand resident feels that we not only have to think of the farm
landowners we've got to think about the crippling effect our taxes are having on
the elderly and you people who can't afford a home here.
Rosemarie Zengen of the Save Our Town Committee... we are vehemently opposed to
the Conservation Easement Plan because we feel there is a lack of information
concerning the plan and also there appears to be a shift of the tax burden from
those residents who own 10 or more acres of land to those less land rich.
We want the Red Hook Town Board to veto any action for this Conservation
Easement Plan.
I wish to submit to the Town Board 55 signatures which I obtained in
approximately 2 hours.
Lisa Griffin questioned if Mr. McKeon took into account the school tax at all or
was it just land tax.
Robert McKeon replied it would affect the overall valuation.
Charles Laing ....could be a useful tool for those who are interested.
Marcy Appell... I feel guilty taking a rebate on my taxes. The Town Board will
hold the easement. It is going to cost the landowner just to get the easement.
Resident Ralph Douglas said that before this program is adopted we need a lot
more detailed information on the affects on the rest of us.
Linda Keeling resident suggested that at the next public hearing people should
sign up and use a microphone. There is one person here who is hearing impaired
and under the American Disability Act they need to hear.
Marc Molinaro, Legislator...development brings new taxes, open space brings new
taxes and at what rate do we expect it and at what pace do we except it. I just
want to offer the County endorses the conservation easement through development
rights through the transfer of development rights and also through contract
easements further the department of management growth that we identified and
adopted. We also called for comprehensive approach. One measure we ought to
consider everything we do shifts burden from one tax payer to another, question
is what are we willing to accept and what rate are we willing to accept it and I
am glad that residents are out and willing to accept it.
Supervisor Blum Bump said we will not close the public hearing and will continue
on June 7, 2005 at 7:15 p.m.
Town Clerk
Margaret E. Doty